Discharge medication delivery location and postpartum blood pressure control in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether use of bedside medication delivery (Meds to Beds, M2B) or on-campus pharmacy at discharge was associated with improved postpartum blood pressure (BP) control compared to outside pharmacy use in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of 357 patients with HDP enrolled in STAMPP-HTN (Systematic Treatment and Management of Postpartum Hypertension Program) who were discharged from delivery admission with antihypertensives between October 2018 and June 2020. Patients were grouped by discharge medication location: M2B/on-campus pharmacy (on-site) versus outside pharmacy (off-site). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was BP values at the immediate postpartum visit. Secondary outcomes included six-week visit BP values, attendance at both visits, and readmission within six weeks. RESULTS: Median BP values were no different based on pharmacy location at immediate postpartum visit for both systolic ((135 [IQR 127, 139] on-site vs 137 [127, 145] off-site, p = 0.22) and diastolic (81 [74, 91] vs 83 [76, 92], p = 0.45) values. Similar findings were noted at six weeks. Patients who used an off-site pharmacy had higher attendance rates at the immediate postpartum visit but this difference was attenuated after adjusting for group differences (OR 0.67 [95 % CI 0.37-1.20], p = 0.18). Readmission rates were also not different between groups (12.2 % on-site vs 15.8 % off-site pharmacy, p = 0.43). CONCLUSION: In the context of a preexisting multicomponent HDP quality improvement program, on-campus pharmacy and bedside medication delivery use was not associated with additional improvement in postpartum BP control, follow-up rates, or readmission rates.

Patient and provider perception of home blood pressure monitoring kits.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant patients of racial/ethnic minorities have higher preeclampsia rates. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has been investigated for disparity reduction. Smaller studies showed patients find HBPM to be a helpful intervention postpartum. Further investigation is needed to define the role of HPBM in an at-risk and diverse population antepartum. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient perception of HBPM among diverse patients at high risk of disease development. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study conducted from April 2020-September 2021. HBPM kits were advertised and interested parties across the United States responded. Cuff Kits were then distributed to participating providers. Providers distributed the kits to patients meeting high-risk criteria for disease development, prioritizing those of racial/ethnic minorities. Surveys were distributed quarterly to providers and patients to assess HBPM perception. RESULTS: 2910 Cuff Kits were distributed to patients at 179 sites in 14 states. Of those, 1160 were distributed to Black patients, 1045 to White patients, and 500 to Hispanic patients. 117 patients completed surveys, with most patients finding Cuff Kits "very valuable" or "valuable" (68.4% and 19.7%, respectively). Most providers (73.4%) felt the Cuff Kits influenced patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving Cuff Kits reported a beneficial impact on disease understanding and most belonged to racial/ethnic groups at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Providers found HBPM had a beneficial impact on care. Though more research is needed to illustrate the impact of HBPM on outcomes, this study suggests that among racial/ethnic minorities and those at the high risk, HBPM is a well-received intervention.

Preeclampsia pathophysiology and adverse outcomes during pregnancy and postpartum.

Background: Preeclampsia is a disease with far-reaching consequences that extend beyond the immediate postpartum period and have a significant impact later in life. Preeclampsia exerts an effect on most organ systems in the body. These sequelae are mediated in part by the incompletely elucidated pathophysiology of preeclampsia and the associated vascular changes. Content: Current research focuses on unraveling the pathophysiology of preeclampsia with the goal of implementing accurate screening and treatment modalities based on disease development and progression. Preeclampsia causes significant short- and long-term maternal morbidity and mortality, not only in the cardiovascular system but also in other organ systems throughout the body. This impact persists beyond pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Summary: The goal of this review is to discuss the current understanding of the pathophysiology of preeclampsia as it relates to the adverse health consequences in patients impacted by this disease, along with a brief discussion of ways to improve overall outcomes.

A Comparison of Obstetric Interventions and Outcomes Between Black and White Patients at an Urban Tertiary Medical Center.

The objective of the study is to evaluate whether rates of selected labor and delivery interventions and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) differ between Black and White pregnant patients. This retrospective observational cohort study included all Black or White pregnant patients who delivered at the University of Chicago Medical Center between January 2015 and December 2019. Data queried included demographic information, antepartum complications, preterm interventions, labor and delivery events, and neonatal outcomes. SMM was a composite outcome, including intensive care unit admission, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, eclampsia, cardiac arrest, or death. In total, 10,885 parturients (9001 Black and 1884 White) and 11,211 neonates (9254 born to Black and 1957 to White patients) were included in the study. Black patients were more likely to have preterm labor (3.51% vs. 1.86%, p = 0.0002) and no prenatal care (17.83% vs. 4.05%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the administration of magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection (Black 44.78% vs. White 49.32%, p = 0.48) or antenatal corticosteroids (Black 67.83% vs. White 71.98%, p = 0.28) among those with preterm delivery. There was no significant difference in SMM (Black 2.24% vs. White 2.44%, p = 0.60), and SMM rates decreased over time (OR 0.79 per year, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87, p < 0.0001) for all patients. Black patients had more pregnancy complications, but their complications were addressed with similar rates of obstetrical interventions. In a high-resource setting, there was no difference in rates of SMM when compared to White patients.

Maternal mortality in the United States: The pervasive effects of racism.

Maternal mortality is a worldwide epidemic, with rates in the United States far surpassing those in similar high-income countries, and years of implicit bias and systemic racism have impacted outcomes for individuals belonging to racial and ethnic minorities. Structural racism must be dismantled to ensure better care for all.

Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Screening for maternal anogenital Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization in pregnancy with initiation of intravenous intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal GBS infection. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and the more typically used vaginal-rectal culture for screening for maternal anogenital GBS colonization in the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Eligible English-language studies published until January 2020 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Studies were compiled that assessed for GBS colonization utilizing vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and vaginal-rectal culture during the third trimester of pregnancy. Nonoriginal research articles and studies that did not assess pregnant patients, did not use culture-based screening, or did not compare vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture with vaginal-rectal culture were excluded. The search identified 559 articles with three prospective cohort studies that met inclusion criteria, including 643 participants. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Patient characteristics and associated pain with specimen collection were abstracted. Meta-analyses of both the raw agreement and the Cohen's kappa statistic were performed. RESULTS: Within the three included studies, the range of GBS detection was 17.6-34.0%, consistent with the anticipated prevalence of GBS colonization reported in earlier publications. For both raw agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient, the test for heterogeneity was not significant, indicating low heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimate of the raw agreement was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95-0.98) and of the Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), indicating (according to the Landis and Koch criteria) an "almost perfect" agreement between the compared clinical tests. In the two studies that assessed procedure-related patient discomfort, vaginal-rectal swabbing caused more discomfort. CONCLUSION: Use of vaginal-perineal culture for assessment of maternal GBS colonization is comparable to the more typically utilized vaginal-rectal culture and is associated with less discomfort.

Clinical effectiveness of adding azithromycin to antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: A recent large clinical trial demonstrated an approximately 50% decrease in the rate of postoperative infection in women who were laboring and/or had rupture of membranes for >4 hours and who received azithromycin in addition to standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of cesarean delivery. Given these results, our institution made a policy change in May 2017 to add azithromycin to standard preoperative prophylaxis for all cesarean deliveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of adding azithromycin to preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a before-and-after cohort study of women delivered via cesarean delivery at our institution. The preimplementation group included women who delivered from March 1, 2016, to February 28, 2017, (before an institutional practice change of adding azithromycin to standard preoperative prophylaxis), and the postimplementation group included women who delivered from September 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018 (allowing a 6-month period for uptake of the practice change). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative infections (endometritis, wound infection, other maternal infections). Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a modified Poisson regression model. RESULTS: In the preimplementation (n=1171) and postimplementation (n=1168) groups, the incidence rates of the composite outcomes were 4.7% and 5.3%, respectively (P=.49). Both unadjusted (relative risk, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.62) and adjusted (adjusted relative risk, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.52) comparisons were not significantly different. In addition, results were statistically nonsignificant, but in the direction of lower rates of infection, in the after cohort for women in labor and/or with rupture of membranes for ≥4 hours (relative risk, 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.39]; adjusted relative risk, 0.82 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.30]) and for women with clinical chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.37 [95% confidence interval, 0.08-1.67]; data too sparse for adjusted analysis). In the subgroup of women who were not in labor, the after cohort had a statistically nonsignificant increased risk of the composite outcome in both unadjusted (relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.72) and adjusted (adjusted relative risk, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.65]) comparisons. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, the addition of azithromycin to standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery may have an effect size smaller than seen in the large clinical trial prompting this practice change. Extrapolation of this regimen to women not in labor may be ineffective.

Imatinib methanesulfonate reduces hippocampal amyloid-ß and restores cognitive function following repeated endotoxin exposure.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized, in part, by atrophy of the adult brain and increased presence of extracellular amyloid-beta (Aß) plaques. Previous studies in our lab have shown that peripheral inflammation can lead to increased central Aß and deficits in learning and memory. In order to determine whether Aß accumulation in the brain is responsible for the learning deficits, we attempted to decrease peripheral production of Aß in order to reduce central Aß accumulation. It has previously been shown that Aß is produced in large quantities in the liver, and is transferred across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Recent research has shown that peripheral treatment with imatinib methanesulfonate salt (IM), known to interfere with the interaction between gamma (γ)-secretase and the γ-secretase activating protein (GSAP), decreases the cleavage of peripheral amyloid precursor protein into Aß. Because IM poorly penetrates the BBB, we hypothesized that co-administration of IM with LPS would decrease peripheral production of Aß in the presence of LPS-induced inflammation, leading to a decrease in Aß accumulation in the hippocampus. We show that peripheral IM treatment eliminates hippocampal Aß elevation that follows LPS-induced peripheral inflammation. Importantly, IM also eliminates the cognitive impairment seen following seven consecutive days of LPS administration, implicating Aß peptides as a likely cause of these cognitive deficits.